Reproducibility + organization

All written work should be reproducible, and the GitHub repo should be neatly organized.

• Points for reproducibility + organization will be based on the reproducibility of the entire repository and the organization of the project GitHub repo.
• The repo should be neatly organized as described above, there should be no extraneous files, all text in the README should be easily readable.

Evaluation criteria

Category	Less developed projects	Typical projects
Reproducibility	Required files are missing. Quarto files do not render successfully (except for if a package needs to be installed).	All required files are provided. Quarto files render without issues and reproduce the necessary outputs.
Data documentation	Codebook is missing. No local copies of data files.	All datasets are stored in a data folder, a codebook is provided, and a local copy of the data file is used in the code where needed.
File readability	Documents lack a clear structure. There are extraneous materials in the repo and/or files are not clearly organized.	Documents (Quarto files and R scripts) are well structured and easy to follow. No extraneous materials.
Issues	Issues have been left open, or are closed mostly without specific commits addressing them.	All issues are closed, mostly with specific commits addressing them.